Stocks are simple. All you do is buy shares in a great business for less than the business is intrinsically worth, with management of the highest integrity and ability. Then you own those shares forever. I will tell you how to become rich. Close the doors. Be fearful when others are greedy. Be greedy when others are fearful.

February 21, 2010

Anthony Boton: Why Start China Fund

In getting us out of the financial crisis we have just been through, many western governments have effectively mortgaged the future.

The combination of governments having to repair their balance sheets, consumers rebuilding saving ratios and constraints on credit growth due to the weak state of the banking sector will result in slower growth than before the crisis – particularly in the US, UK and Europe.

This will become apparent once the strong recovery phase we are now in runs its course – probably by some time next year.

Because of this, the faster growth being seen in economies such as China’s will appear relatively attractive and I believe
that a lot of money will continue to flow into the region from investors in the developed world.

Jim O’Neill, head of global economic research at Goldman Sachs, has said: “What is going on in China remains, quite simply, the most remarkable and important economic story of our, and possibly our children’s, generation.” I totally agree.

The situation in China today is very similar to that in Taiwan or South Korea during their fast growth phases 20 or so years ago – and in Japan before that.

However, growth is occurring on an even bigger scale because of the enormous size of the Chinese population.

Just as consumers in the west start to rebuild their savings rates, consumers in China are likely to start running down their very high savings.

Many areas of the economy are in the steepest part of their development curve as consumer incomes reach a level where increasing numbers of people can aspire to own homes, cars and household goods.

Because of the scale of what is happening, and the effectiveness of a centrally-
run economy that other emerging markets do not enjoy, the world may never see anything like this again.

All of this is why I am deferring my retirement and returning to running money. I have become increasingly convinced by the investment opportunities available in China today.

I recently spent three months based in Fidelity’s Hong Kong office and this rekindled my interest in the region – and China in particular.

After a few weeks there, I said to my wife that the exciting opportunities available in China, and my belief that the market could go a lot higher over the next few years, made me wish I was still managing money.

Rather to my surprise, she said that as I only had one life I should consider running a fund again while I still had the opportunity. I spent the next few weeks discussing the idea with my family and senior colleagues before deciding to give it a go.

No-one should imagine the ride will be smooth. China is an emerging market and the volatility of its stock markets will remain higher than in developed markets.

Although it would have been wonderful to have started a new fund at the beginning of this year when all stock markets were in the “bargain basement” category, I believe China is still fairly valued today rather than expensive.

We are only one year into the new Chinese bull market and I think it has the potential to go on for several more years.

Next year, I expect most world markets to consolidate. China will not be immune but this year
it has already experienced a longer retrenchment
than many other markets.

Could a bubble form in Chinese equities? I do not know, but many of the conditions necessary are there and a number of strategists are predicting one.

An experienced Asian observer has said: “As everyone knows, a bubble is a market that rises rapidly in which one is
not invested; if one is invested, then it is a bull market.”

I have a lot of sympathy with this view and I believe that, like bull markets, bubbles normally continue for several years.

I have been visiting China over the last five years, normally making two visits a year to see Chinese companies.

When I ran the Fidelity Special Situations Fund, I put up to 5 per cent of it into Chinese stocks between 2005 and 2007.

More broadly, Fidelity has been investing in China for more than 16 years and has three portfolio managers, as well as five analysts and three dedicated traders. We are certainly not new to the country.

I hope my experience and perspective will add to this already well-resourced team.

I will bring my successful Special Situations investment approach to Chinese stocks as well as running a fund that will benefit from China’s very attractive secular growth.

For an investor like me, the opportunity is simply too great to pass up. My retirement can wait a while yet.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Published: October 16 2009 18:12 | Last updated: October 16 2009 18:12

In an attempt to dig us out of the financial crisis, the governments of many developed economies have mortgaged their futures. Their unprecedented fiscal stimulus has significantly increased the ratio of public debt to national income. Consequently, I believe that the growth rate to which these developed economies will return – once the short-term recovery phase is over – will be lower than in the past.

This has important asset allocation implications for investors in developed market equities.

To understand the nature of the recovery that we have been experiencing over the past six months, we need to examine the decline that preceded it. The downturn was very much corporate rather than consumer-led. Across the globe, and simultaneously, the financial crisis led chief executives of companies to cut inventories, capital expenditure and staff numbers.

As a result of this synchronised action, the economic data in the last quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009 looked terrible.

More recently, conditions have reversed as companies have regained their confidence and started to rebuild inventories, leading to a slowing in the growth of unemployment. However, the financial crisis has left us with longer-term problems, particularly relating to the consumer, which will overshadow world economies once the initial recovery phase is over.

My contention is that a combination of consumers rebuilding their balance sheets, slower credit creation in this upturn than was historically the case, and governments being forced to cut spending or increase taxes will lead to lower growth than before the crisis.

The big question now is whether the relative growth advantage of emerging markets over the developed world has increased.

I think it has – particularly for emerging markets that are driven by domestic demand and investment. I am less keen on those markets where exports or commodities are the main drivers. One reason these are less attractive today is the fact that commodity shares and industrial companies were the leaders of the last bull market.

In my experience, it is unusual for sectors that are the stars of one bull market to take the lead in the next, particularly if share prices in the late stages of the previous bull market enter a “bubble” phase as they did in 2006 and the first half of 2007.

In the first phase of a new bull market, investors sometimes do return to play the winners of the last cycle but this does not prove sustainable.

The best conditions for commodities are either synchronised above-trend world growth – as we experienced in the last bull market, and which we are unlikely to see any time soon – or strong inflation.

My view on inflation is that it may be a longer-term threat but that it is unlikely to be a problem in the next couple of years because of the low growth environment and excess capacity in the west.

Finally, from a shorter-term perspective, some of the extraordinarily rapid credit expansion in China this year has been used by companies to stockpile commodities. As this credit expansion now slows, and as Chinese companies use up their excess inventories, I expect demand for commodities in the near term to be softer.

I don’t think that low growth in the US and Europe is necessarily bad for equity investment in general. Low interest rates that will accompany this sub-par growth will lead investors to seek the higher returns offered by risk assets such as equities, corporate bonds and property. I have been arguing that this will drive a multi-year bull market (especially as cash on the sidelines is still high and a number of professional investors remain very cautious).

Even so, the equity market may need a sustained period of consolidation, probably next year, as this first phase has been so strong.

In an environment of lower growth, I expect investors to seek out companies, sectors and countries that can grow faster than average. So, in the next stage of the bull market, growth will be rewarded – and I expect that it will be rewarded by investors with higher valuations than is normally the case.

If that is the case, then UK investors’ typical exposure to emerging markets, of about 15-20 per cent of an equity portfolio, could prove too low. Perhaps, for the next few years, they should consider having a majority of their exposure to markets that can provide higher growth.

But if all investors in developed markets make similar changes to their asset allocation, I believe we will have all the ingredients necessary for a new bubble to develop over the next few years in these volatile but rewarding markets.

Fasten your seat belts – we are in for a bumpy, but enjoyable, ride.



The only 3 questions that count

掌握别人不知道的事情才能超越大盘
三个子问题:
1. 我们必须找到那些我们相信但其实是错误的?
2. 别人难以测定的问题,我如何测量? 非传统思考-out of the box thinking
3. 我的脑袋干吗要误导我?-我如何摆脱不让我对市场有正确思考的脑袋?

1. 我们必须找到那些我们相信但其实是错误的?
高PE风险未必高,PE根本不能告诉你股市的风险和走势。当我看到股市PE高而担心时,我可以打赌股市不会下跌,虽然有时不是这样,比如2000年,但我通常是对的,比如96,97,98,99和2003年。
2/3靠不犯错误,1/3靠做对正确的事情。
赤字对经济不好,对股市不好?回顾历史,美国与全球的巨额赤字都伴随大幅高于平均水平的股市报酬。反倒是盈余伴随熊市,如1999,2000年的盈余。

美元疲软不利股市?
利率上扬不利股市?利率下跌是好的?
减税造成更多的债务,不利股市?
高油价不利股市及经济?
经济好的时候,股市也好?
成长快速的国家股市表现优于缓慢的。
小型股表现优于大型股。
美国的债务太多了。 (错,美国需要更多的债务)
经常帐和贸易逆差不利于股市
低价股表现优于不那么低价的。

January 31, 2010

段永平再创投资奇迹:买入GE 1年获利上亿美元

2009年3月初,《第一财经日报》记者和步步高创始人、企业家兼投资家段永平曾经通过一次越洋电话。当时,美国股市大跌,段永平告诉记者,“这可能是我们这辈子能遇到的最大一次机会。”

   他还说,做投资总是要相信一点什么,要是一点也不信那就不要做投资了。“比如我觉得GE(通用电气)是一家诚信的公司,我看他们的CEO讲话是有道理 的,不是不可信的那种。GE有这么多的尖端技术,比如环保技术,只要人类发展,就会需要。我在GE30多美元一股的时候就关注过,但觉得有点贵,现在已经 六七美元了,比它的价值实在低多了。”当时他说自己正在买入GE。

  一眨眼就是2010年了。记者查了一下,GE现在的股价是16美元 多。虽然利润同比在下滑,但2009年每股收益仍有1美元(4个季度分别为26、24、22、28美分)。记者再次向段永平核实,他说:“我不愿意说自己 究竟买了多少GE的股票,但我一旦出手,总是会比较集中,投资额比较大。”记者问,刚开始投资GE时动用的资金是否有1亿美元以上,段永平表示,“一两亿 美元肯定是有的”。

  以此推算,段永平在GE上的账面盈利,应该在上亿美元以上。

  比巴菲特的买点还低

  GE是一家在全球享有很高声誉的综合性企业,其创始人为爱迪生。但受累于金融危机和旗下GE Capital利润大幅下滑,GE一度也陷入危机,股价从2008年高点的38美元一路下跌。

   2008年10月2日,“股神”巴菲特继购买投资银行高盛的部分股权后,宣布将收购30亿美元GE永久性优先股,并获得在5年里的任何时候以每股 22.25美元的价格,购买30亿美元GE普通股的权利。巴菲特在接受美国媒体采访时说:“我已经观察GE这家公司很久了。现在的市场给我们提供了大量的 投资机会,而这在6个月或者一年之前是难以想象的。”

  但是危机还在加剧。2009年2月20日,GE股价跌至10美元以下。3月第一周 更是连连下跌。3月4日,在纽约证券交易所(NYSE)常规交易中,GE股价一度下触5.73美元,是自1991年12月以来首次跌破6美元,收盘至 6.69美元,跌幅4.6%,还不够买两个GE自有品牌的灯泡。洛杉矶一家资产管理公司Envision Capital Management Inc总裁玛丽莲·柯恩(Marilyn Cohen)将GE比喻为“让所有人都不敢靠近的麻风病患者”,有看空者甚至预言,“GE将是下一个AIG”。

  当时,国内的一些论坛上,已经有了“看巴菲特上吊”的帖子。

  段永平正是在此时开始强力出手。

   在股价跌到低谷的时候,包括CEO伊梅尔特在内的GE高管联手买进25万股GE股票。伊梅尔特坦言,像GE这种拥有金融服务业务的公司的确受到了冷落, 但GE是一家拥有130年历史的成长型企业,经历了九次衰退和一次萧条。他正努力推动公司抵御衰退周期,将会从新兴市场的增长、清洁能源和可持续医疗等方 面受益。

  GE股价下跌到12美元时,在分析师阵营中看多GE的摩根士丹利分析师斯科特·戴维斯说:“我们从不否认该公司存在各种问题。 不过,其股价已经从38 美元降到了12美元。如果一只股票下跌了70%,我觉得人们就可以推断股价已经消化了许多利空消息……在上一次经济下降周期中,GE的制造业务只有轻微的 下滑。它的核心业务——比如发电机、医疗设备和飞机发动机——不怎么受经济周期的影响,而且能赚取大量的现金。在我们看来,这只股票还会有20% 的降幅,随后将会上涨100%。这就是我们看多的原因。”

  从2009年3月到9月,GE的股价逐步回升至14美元多,半年时间上升超过100%。今年1月8日,GE收盘报16.40美元,此前摩根大通将GE目标由20美元上调至22美元,并表示投资者低估了GE Capital的潜在盈利复苏能力。

  在对GE的投资上,段永平的入股价比巴菲特要低很多。

  跟巴菲特比像“过家家”

  当记者确认了段永平以比巴菲特更低的价格投资GE的事实后,写了一篇短小的博客《段永平投资GE超越巴菲特》,文中注明所谓超越是指在GE这一个案例上。

  一向强调做企业要本分的段永平昨天给记者回复邮件,并打来越洋电话。他说绝不能妄言超越巴菲特,“不然就像有人高尔夫打了个小鸟(birdie,击球杆数低于标准杆数1杆)就说自己已经超越老虎·伍兹一样。跟巴菲特比,我们的投资还有点像过家家,完全不在一个级别。”

   这位曾以62万美元拍下与巴菲特共进晚餐机会的投资家回忆说:“和巴菲特聊天时,他教了很多有关投资的东西,但我问的问题主要是我们投资时不应该做什 么。我觉得巴菲特在投资上比所有人强的最重要的地方,就是他知道自己什么东西不应该做,尤其是对一个极成功的人来说,这非常不容易。顺便讲一下,去年我还 买了些巴菲特的股票,到目前为止,至少赚了几个饭钱吧。”

  据说,巴菲特说的“不应该做”的事情包括,第一不做空,第二不借钱炒股,第三不做不懂的东西,因为这三者都意味着无限风险。

   段永平在邮件中写道:“很多人关心和巴菲特的这顿饭到底能值几何?我的理解是,在一个人的投资生涯中,他至少值几个自己的身家——如果你能理解他到底都 在讲什么的话。很遗憾,我发现这世界居然有这么多人根本就没去认真理解一下。可惜,可惜呀,这可是最地道的赚钱办法呀。”

  对于GE,段永平写道:“我确实重仓买了很多GE,且大部分都在低位附近,运气好啊,那个时候居然手里还有钱。我一直很喜欢GE的企业文化,它就是我们企业界的老虎·伍兹。呵呵,老虎也有犯错的时候,不过他会回来的。”

  投资创维和Yahoo

   记者还向段永平核实他是否投资了新浪、搜狐和港股创维数码(00751.HK),他也做了回答:“我们当时的确买了接近5%的创维股票,这也是我们迄今 为止投的唯一一只港股。本来还想多买点,不过由于要超过5%,我很想和黄宏生沟通一下,以免被误解认为我们在恶意收购。可惜呀,他当时不方便,我们也就算 了。投资中总是有很多遗憾,所以也很正常。”

  段永平证实,近一年来买了很多Yahoo股票,前两天还买了不少。“我挺喜欢淘宝,觉得马 云是个非常不错的经营者,他是我认识的人中对企业文化理解最好的。虽然在淘宝里有人卖我们的假货,不过我相信有一天他会解决这个问题。Yahoo拥有 40%左右的阿里巴巴的股份,怎么看都应该有30美元一股以上的价值,市场早晚会反映出来,就像马克思所讲:价格是围绕价值上下波动的。”

  但他说,“不方便讲具体的金额和数量。”

  在和记者通话时,段永平说,其实单从投资的回报倍数看,投资创维数码是很高的。1港元左右买,几年工夫,前段最高涨到8港元多,“我们在6块、7块都卖了很多”。如果不是黄宏生事件的影响,“我们当时会买得更多。”

  段永平最后对记者说,巴菲特在金融危机中也买了不少股票,有的在他买之后还继续跌,但陆陆续续都涨回来了。“他买GE,买高盛,却不买雷曼兄弟、AIG,表面看是偶然,其实是多年的功力。他能做到'不中招’,这是多么深的功夫。”

  在电子邮件的最后,段永平说:“我现在和太太花不少时间和心思在慈善上。花钱比赚钱难啊。这话可能要招板砖,不过谁要是明白了,谁就被进步了,呵呵。”

January 25, 2010

银行股估值偏低

交通银行 EPS=0.58RMB BPS=3.36RMB AT 7.9HKD (6.95RMB) = PE11.98,PB=2.06
建设银行 EPS=0.41RMB BPS=2.4 RMB at 5.83 HKD (5.13RMB) = PE 12.51 PB=2.13

后市操作-回归72周线

如我上两星期预测的一样,HSI, 2628, 2318 月线KDJ果然这月死叉,看来这次调整幅度应该和04年2月的一样,大概是高位的28.7%, 要碰72周线,算下来大概在17800-17900一带,我现在的任务应该是等,同时尽量收回cash,等待到时全力出击。人寿大概在30.5 元左右, 平安56 HKD。

January 18, 2010

国寿、平安、太保的实际市盈率(P/EVE)分别为19.1倍、12.9倍、16.7倍

http://insurance.hexun.com/2010-01-18/122392708.html
王小罡指出,保险公司(主要指寿险公司)的内含价值(EV)相当于其他行业公司的净资产,保险公司的内含价值收益(即内含价值的实际增长,或 EVE,EV Earning)则相当于其他行业公司的净利润。因此,保险公司的实际市净率为P/EV,实际市盈率为P/EVE,实际净资产收益率为EVE/EV。

  李双武表示,市场经常只看一个公司的市盈率、市净率,而这不是判断保险股是否具有投资价值的主要因素。保险公司的特点是看其内含价值,比如说太保,按12%的折现率,意味着中国太保的净资产,每年是按12%的内含价值增速往上涨的,也就是说在内含价值以下买中国太保,内含价值每年都会有12%的增长。

  以市盈率来看,国寿、平安最近分别为50倍、46倍,太保则高达138倍。王小罡指出,从内含价值的角度看,2009年平安的内含价值为20元 /股,国寿和太保均在11元/股左右;而从内含价值收益角度看,国寿、平安、太保分别为1.56元/股、4.01元/股、1.51元/股。由此得出国寿、平安、太保的实际市盈率(P/EVE)分别为19.1倍、12.9倍、16.7倍。

  王小罡表示,从这些数字可以看到,三大保险股的估值都比较低,特别是平安,2009年不到13倍,2010年预测值不到11倍。A股市场上平安现在每股50多块钱,对比其他两家保险公司,性价比更高、成长性也较好的平安其实已经相当便宜,很适合长期持有。

  在王小罡看来,三大保险股H股股价高于A股的现象在2010年还会持续,而且将来会持续多长时间,并不好判断。

January 15, 2010

利润稳定,可以说是零风险的生意,特许专营制度

华润入住郑州 燃气供应更足
——访郑州华润燃气有限公司董事长闫国起
本报记者 王文霞

郑州华润燃气公司成立后,会对郑州的燃气供应带来哪些新变化?市民用气是不是会更有保证?昨日,郑州华润燃气有限公司董事长闫国起接受记者采访时表示,华润的入住,将使郑州燃气管网的建设更有资金保证,气源更加充足。

闫国起介绍说,华润投资郑州燃气后,可以让公司开拓更广阔的领域,郑州燃气本身是上市企业,除郑州外,还有南阳、平顶山、登封,3.2亿元的投资让郑州燃气事业的发展更有保障,城市建设到哪儿,燃气管网就铺设到哪儿,避免重复挖路。目前郑州燃气连续7年增加用气量,每年增加量都在5000立方米~6000立方米之间,西气东输二线通气后,还要建设部分西气东输支线和郑州新区管线建设。

燃气价格会不会提高?闫国起说,郑州华润燃气是企业,价格不是由企业决定的。国家发改委管着气源价格,省发改委管着天然气的零售价格。但天然气价格将逐步与国际接轨,西气东输二线一部分气源来自国外,价格上可能会高于国内自采气的价格

春节前天然气会不会供应紧张?闫国起说,今年寒流来得比较早,但郑州准备充分,相比武汉等一些城市影响较轻,出租车大概有一个星期的加气难。现在每天的天然气供应量是春秋两季的两倍以上,目前除了来自中石油、中石化的天然气,还有液化气、压缩天然气,基本能满足郑州市场需要。另外,西气东输二线通气后,郑州燃气和中石油签订了5年6亿立方米的供气协议,供气首年的2010年将向郑州供应1亿立方米。同时,明年年底高压环线建成后,可以增加30万立方米储气量,可满足全市居民4天~5天的供应量。而且该环线从四周向市中心送气,还可缓解以前管网末梢气压不稳或达不到的情况。

华润集团成立于香港,是国务院国资委直接管辖的特大型企业集团。近年来,华润燃气集团公司快速发展,目前已在南京、武汉、福州等60多座大中城市设立了燃 气企业,年供气量超过60亿立方米,用户超过500万户,成为国内近年发展最快、规模最大的燃气专业运营商。郑州华润燃气有限公司董事长闫国起表示,公司 的成立将对郑州燃气今后发展提供强有力的保障。
“以后公司发展经济上更可靠了,首先西气东输来了以后,我们有充足的资金建设配套的工程,郑州的燃气配套设施将更加合力和完善,气压更加稳定气源更加充足。”
据了解,这次华润燃气落户中原将对西气东输二线的建设,以及今后对外的扩张发展注入新的活力。闫国起说,目前公司已有了一系列的规划,明年西气东输二线通气以后,郑州市供气不足的问题将得到根本的解决。
“现在我们除了和西气东输二线做配套之外,另外我们燃气的发展规划,我们还要建设一个外环的高压管线,我们建成这个环线以后,可以均匀的从四周向市区提供 稳定的气源,市区的管网压力就会均衡,官网末梢压力低的现象就会得到根本的缓解,另外高压管线也能起到储气的功能,整个外环的高压管线建成以后,可以增加 郑州储气能力30万方。现在我们已经和中石油意向签订了6亿立方米的气源供气量,按照双方签订的协议,分五年时间,每年不少于一个亿,五年达到六个亿,到 时候郑州将有充足的气源供应请大家放心。”

目前,郑州每天的供气量是春秋两季的两倍以上,但是由于准备充足,基本保证了正常供应。另外,公司还储存了大量液化气并从山西等地购进了大量压缩天然气弥补不足。明年西气东输二线建成通气后,中石油还将按照已签协议,分5年向郑州华润燃气供气6亿立方米,可基本解决气荒。

  管网末梢低压升高

  另据介绍,目前除西气东输二线规划外,郑州市燃气发展规划已经通过了郑州市规划局的评审,此次二线支线工程,将建设一个外环高压管线,可从四周向市区均匀输送天然气,市区各个管网压力均衡,管网末梢压力低的状况将得到缓解。

  该管线还具有储气功能,建成后可以增加储气能力30万立方米,气源短缺时,可供老百姓4天到5天正常生活使用。

华润燃气提价50%收购郑州燃气 将占河南70%份额
http://news.hexun.com/2009-12-15/122024619.html
12月14日,华润燃气宣布提高对郑州燃气的全面要约收购报价,由每股8.45元调升至12.96元。

  调价方案公布后,14日,郑州燃气与华润燃气双双报涨。“这显示出,市场对于这桩收购案的前景持看好的态度。”中银国际一位燃气行业分析师对本报记者说。

  若这一交易最终完成,华润燃气将拥有河南燃气分销市场70%的份额。天然气市场井喷在即,华润燃气正加速跑马圈地。

提价50%

  此前的11月25日,华润燃气宣布,将与郑州燃气控股股东郑州市国资委成立合资公司,经营郑州及南阳和平顶山地区的燃气业务,经营时间为30年。

  根据方案,合资公司注册资本为9.5亿元,华润燃气及郑州市国资委分别持有80%及20%股权。其中,华润燃气出资7.6亿元现金,郑州市国资 委提供 1.9亿元资产,而合资公司将以4.22亿元向郑州市国资委收购郑州燃气43.18%股权。此外,华润燃气还将负责赔偿郑州燃气及郑州燃气公司的员工,总 代价约4.57亿元。

  由于这一收购将导致郑州燃气控股权变动,从而触发强制要约收购,华润燃气提出,以每股8.45元向郑州燃气其它股东进行强制收购。

  方案提出次日,华润燃气与郑州燃气双双复牌,但表现迥异。华润燃气大涨12%,而郑州燃气则暴挫9.2%。

  “华润燃气提出的要约收购价格,比郑州燃气停牌前的价格折让了约40%,部分收购和全面收购要约的价格均只有5.1倍的市盈率,这让郑州燃气的其他股东感到难以接受。如果方案不调整,全面收购被否决的可能性非常大,这迫使华润燃气不得不调高收购价格。”上述分析师说。

  “早在6年前,我们就开始与郑州燃气进行谈判,2009年上半年,我们已经敲定了基本方案。不过,由于这几个月以来,受天然气涨价等信息的刺 激,燃气股大涨,郑州燃气从9块港币涨到17块港币,这才显得我们报出的收购价格较市场价有所低估。为了表示诚意,我们决定调高收购价格。”华润燃气一位 人士对记者表示。

  入主河南

  中国天然气市场已至井喷前夜。此次华润燃气大幅提高对郑州燃气的收购价格,显示出其对中国燃气市场志在必得。

  “相对于新奥燃气、中华燃气等民营、外资燃气商,华润燃气在开发上游资源方面,有明显的短板,所以,其对国内石油巨头的输气管道更为依赖,而河南正好在输气管线方面具有得天独厚的优势。”河南省燃气协会一位人士说。

  目前,不但西气东输、川气入豫等管线经过河南,而且来自山东、华北的液化石油气资源,也都通过这里转往沿海省份。因此,河南市场早就成为各燃气公司争夺的热点。除华润燃气之外,新奥燃气、中裕燃气以及英国富地集团等都已在河南安营扎寨。

  此番,通过收购郑州燃气,华润燃气将成为这一地区当之无愧的“霸主”。

  资料显示,郑州燃气不仅是郑州管道燃气的垄断供应商,其还于2007年及2008年相继进军周边的南阳和平顶山市场。而华润燃气,则在2007年通过收编河南东方能源股份公司在安阳市场占据主导地位。重组完成后,华润燃气在河南市场的份额将达到70%。

  跑马圈地

  “目前,国内天然气的销售价格一般是出厂价的2倍,其中的利润空间主要由管道运营商和下游城市管网运营所瓜分对于城市管网运营商来说,最大的 特点是利润稳定,可以说是零风险的生意。因为,如果成本上升,燃气运营商可以比较容易的通过涨价来转嫁成本压力。而要实现更大的收益,最重要的是抢到更多 的地盘。”广东油气商会一位人士对记者说。

  而整个天然气市场规模的扩大,亦在预期之中。

  “国内天然气上游管道建设,将在未来两三年陆续完成,天然气供应会有翻倍的增长,而天然气价格改革也将于近期出台,由此,整个城市燃气分销下游 行业,将获得一个绝好的发展机会。”上述华润燃气人士对记者表示,目前,国内燃气运营实行的是特许专营制度,拿下了一个地区的市场就意味着拥有稳定的利 润,“我们设定的内部回报率是,不低于15%”。

  在行业大发展的预期之下,华润燃气正在加速“跑马圈地”。事实上,不仅是在河南,仅近期,华润燃气已陆续拿下了武汉、昆明、泸州、通州、福州等城市的管道燃气特许经营权。

January 11, 2010

A Conversation with Benjamin Graham 1976

http://valuehunter.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/conversation-ben-graham.pdf

A Conversation with Benjamin Graham
Financial Analysts Journal - 1976
In the light of your 60-odd years of experience in Wall Street what is your overall view
of common stocks?
Common stocks have one important characteristics and one important speculative
characteristic. Their investment value and average market price tend to increase
irregularly but persistently over the decades, as their net worth builds up through the
reinvestment of undistributed earnings--incidentally, with no clear-cut plus or minus
response to inflation. However, most of the time common stocks are subject to irrational
and excessive price fluctuations in both directions, as the consequence of the ingrained
tendency of most people to speculate or gamble--i.e., to give way to hope, fear and greed.
What is your view of Wall Street as a financial institution?
A highly unfavorable--even a cynical--one. The Stock Exchanges appear to me chiefly as
a John Bunyan type of Vanity Fair, or a Falstaffian joke, that frequently degenerates into a
madhouse--"a tale full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." The stock market
resembles a huge laundry in which institutions take in large blocks of each other's
washing--nowadays to the tune of 30 million shares a day--without true rhyme or reason.
But technologically it is remarkably well-organized.
What is your view of the financial community as a whole?
Most of the stockbrokers, financial analysts, investment advisers, etc., are above average
in intelligence, business honesty and sincerity. But they lack adequate experience with all
types of security markets and an overall understanding of common stocks--of what I call
"the nature of the beast." They tend to take the market and themselves too seriously. They
spend a large part of their time trying, valiantly and ineffectively, to do things they can't
do well.
What sort of things, for example?
To forecast short- and long-term changes in the economy, and in the price level of
common stocks, to select the most promising industry groups and individual issues--
generally for the near-term future.
Can the average manager of institutional funds obtain better results than the Dow
Jones Industrial Average or the Standard & Poor's Index over the years?
No. In effect, that would mean that the stock market experts as a whole could beat
themselves--a logical contradiction.
Do you think, therefore, that the average institutional client should be content with the
DJIA results or the equivalent?
Yes. Not only that, but I think they should require approximately such results over, say, a
moving five-year average period as a condition for paying standard management fees to
advisors and the like.
What about the objection made against so-called index funds that different investors
have different requirements?
At bottom that is only a convenient cliche or alibi to justify the mediocre record of the
past. All investors want good results from their investments, and are entitled to them to
the extent that they are actually obtainable. I see no reason why they should be content
with results inferior to those of an indexed fund or pay standard fees for such inferior
results.
Turning now to individual investors, do you think that they are at a disadvantage
compared with the institutions, because of the latter's huge resources, superior
facilities for obtaining information, etc.?
On the contrary, the typical investor has a great advantage over the large institutions.
Why?
Chiefly because these institutions have a relatively small field of common stocks to
choose from--say 300 to 400 huge corporations--and they are constrained more or less to
concentrate their research and decisions on this much over-analyzed group. By contrast,
most individuals can choose at any time among some 3000 issues listed in the Standard &
Poor's Monthly Stock Guide. Following a wide variety of approaches and preferences, the
individual investor should at all times be able to locate at least one per cent of the total
list--say, 30 issues or more--that offer attractive buying opportunities.
What general rules would you offer the individual investor for his investment policy
over the years?
Let me suggest three such rules: (1) The individual investor should act consistently as an
investor and not as a speculator. This means, in sum, that he should be able to justify
every purchase he makes and each price he pays by impersonal, objective reasoning that
satisfies him that he is getting more than his money's worth for his purchase--in other
words, that he has a margin of safety, in value terms, to protect his commitment. (2) The
investor should have a definite selling policy for all his common stock commitments,
corresponding to his buying techniques. Typically, he should set a reasonable profit
objective on each purchase--say 50 to 100 per cent--and a maximum holding period for
this objective to be realized--say, two to three years. Purchases not realizing the gain
objective at the end of the holding period should be sold out at the market. (3) Finally, the
investor should always have a minimum percentage of his total portfolio in common
stocks and a minimum percentage in bond equivalents. I recommend at least 25 per cent
of the total at all times in each category. A good case can be made for a consistent 50-50
division here, with adjustments for changes in the market level. This means the investor
would switch some of his stocks into bonds on significant rises of the market level, and
vice-versa when the market declines. I would suggest, in general, an average seven- or
eight-year maturity for his bond holdings.
In selecting the common stock portfolio, do you advise careful study of and selectivity
among different issues?
In general, no. I am no longer an advocate of elaborate techniques of security analysis in
order to find superior value opportunities. This was a rewarding activity, say, 40 years
ago, when our textbook "Graham and Dodd" was first published; but the situation has
changed a great deal since then. In the old days any well-trained security analyst could do
a good professional job of selecting undervalued issues through detailed studies; but in
the light of the enormous amount of research now being carried on, I doubt whether in
most cases such extensive efforts will generate sufficiently superior selections to justify
their cost. To that very limited extent I'm on the side of the "efficient market" school of
thought now generally accepted by the professors.
What general approach to portfolio formation do you advocate?
Essentially, a highly simplified one that applies a single criteria or perhaps two criteria to
the price to assure that full value is present and that relies for its results on the
performance of the portfolio as a whole--i.e., on the group results--rather than on the
expectations for individual issues.
Can you indicate concretely how an individual investor should create and maintain his
common stock portfolio?
I can give two examples of my suggested approach to this problem. One appears severely
limited in its application, but we found it almost unfailingly dependable and satisfactory
in 30-odd years of managing moderate-sized investment funds. The second represents a
great deal of new thinking and research on our part in recent years. It is much wider in its
application than the first one, but it combines the three virtues of sound logic, simplicity
of application, and an extraordinarily good performance record, assuming--contrary to
fact--that it had actually been followed as now formulated over the past 50 years--from
1925 to 1975.
Some details, please, on your two recommended approaches.
My first, more limited, technique confines itself to the purchase of common stocks at less
than their working-capital value, or net-current-asset value, giving no weight to the plant
and other fixed assets, and deducting all liabilities in full from the current assets. We used
this approach extensively in managing investment funds, and over a 30-odd year period
we must have earned an average of some 20 per cent per year from this source. For a
while, however, after the mid-1950's, this brand of buying opportunity became very
scarce because of the pervasive bull market. But it has returned in quantity since the
1973-74 decline. In January 1976 we counted over 300 such issues in the Standard &
Poor's Stock Guide--about 10 per cent of the total. I consider it a foolproof method of
systematic investment--once again, not on the basis of individual results but in terms of
the expectable group outcome.
Finally, what is your other approach?
This is similar to the first in its underlying philosophy. It consists of buying groups of
stocks at less than their current or intrinsic value as indicated by one or more simple
criteria. The criterion I prefer is seven times the reported earnings for the past 12 months.
You can use others--such as a current dividend return above seven per cent or book value
more than 120 percent of price, etc. We are just finishing a performance study of these
approaches over the past half-century--1925-1975. They consistently show results of 15
per cent or better per annum, or twice the record of the DJIA for this long period. I have
every confidence in the threefold merit of this general method based on (a) sound logic,
(b) simplicity of application, and (c) an excellent supporting record. At bottom it is a
technique by which true investors can exploit the recurrent excessive optimism and
excessive apprehension of the speculative public.

January 07, 2010

郑晓军 15-60PE

跟长金投资的接触不是第一次了。之前印象最深的有两点。其一,长金1号这只结构化产品,一度排在2009年私募结构化产品收益的第一名;其二,其掌门人郑晓军有多年实业经验,是个坚定的价值投资者。

  12月17日下午,理财周报私募调研小组在北京和深圳调研完毕之后,再次来到位于广州中信广场的长金投资,与其核心人物郑晓军进行了两个小时的深入交流。

准确判断趋势:结构化产品排名第一

  据郑晓军介绍,目前长金公司共有5期产品,3个结构型产品,2个非结构型产品,总规模接近5亿元。另外,正在发行或准备发行的有两期产品。

  从长金目前的产品类型不难看出,其对结构化产品非常之重视。

  长金的第一只阳光私募产品长金1号,发行于2008年10月,当时A股正处于击穿2000点后的恐慌性下跌过程中。郑晓军回忆说,当时的全市场静态市盈率已经接近15倍。从价值投资的角度来说,已经进入价值投资区域。但是当时整个市场恐慌情绪蔓延,即使发产品也很少有人愿意认购。

  鉴于当时的情况,他选择了结构化产品作为长金的第一只产品。也就是公司拿出一部分自有资金来,对产品的最低收益进行保底。“冒了一定的风险,”他回忆,“但是基于坚定的价值投资理念以及十几年A股的投资经验,觉得不会出大问题。”现在来看,长金成为了成功的抄底者。时至今日,长金1号在阳光私募所有公布的结构化产品中名列前茅,最新净值显示回报为114%。

  如何能够做到准确地判断大趋势?郑晓军认为,纵观A股十几年的运行规律。一般静态市盈率的波动区间在15倍到60倍之间。一旦下跌至15倍附近或者上升至60倍附近,则出现反转的概率就非常大了。

  从产业资本的角度出发:价值投资三步走

  在跟郑晓军面对面的过程中,我们力图找出长金投资价值投资的方法论。

  郑晓军介绍,其价值投资分为三步走。第一步,通过长金独特的选股系统,在1600多家A股上市公司中,选出30-50家公司,构成一级股票池。他介绍,这个选股系统主要由量化指标构成。包括净资产回报率,自由现金流等指标,“指标的设置和选择融入了长金做实业十几年的经验”。第二步,根据长金投研团队对商业模式的理解,对一级股票池进行定性分析,从中选出20只左右的股票,构成核心股票池。第三步,结合当前的股价,选出最有投资价值的5家左右的公司,进行建仓。

  从这三个步骤,就不难看出长金的操作风格:精选个股,集中投资。

  郑晓军介绍,其单只信托产品的持仓一般不超过5只股票。“分析透了,看准了就重仓介入,长期持有。”

  他回忆到,当年从2004年12月到2007年6月,持有苏宁电器(002024,股吧)30个月,涨幅近20倍,是他的得意之作。“之所以能拿这么长时间,是因为我们关注的重点在企业本身,而很少关心价格。”

  值得一提的是,郑晓军本人具有十多年的实业经验。调研小组注意到,郑晓军除了长金投资之外,还有诸多其他公司。他是上市公司智光电气(002169,股吧)的实际控制人,同时还在珠三角地区投资了部分电厂等行业。此外,长金旗下目前还有部分PE项目在运作。

  长期持股,很少交易

  目前长金的核心团队有三人:郑晓军任总经理兼投资总监,金鑫任首席风控官,卢昕任研究总监。此外有5名研究员以及2名专职交易员。

  从投资风格来说,郑晓军介绍,长金的风格是做“结合中长期趋势的价值投资”。持股时间很长,有时候一年甚至两三年才会换一次股。

  他介绍,产生交易一般是两种情况,一是认为中长期趋势出现了重要拐点,必须清仓。郑晓军介绍,他在2007年9月份,上证指数4000-5500区间,对A股进行了清仓,然后把所有的资金用于打新股。“当时基于几个简单的判断,一是A股整体的静态市盈率已经接近60倍,历史经验表明,这已经接近顶部区域;二是当时的市场环境下,打新股的年化收益率超过30%。”

  “既然打新股可以拿到几乎无风险的30%的年收益,为什么要在A股里面拿着60倍市盈率的股票睡不着觉呢?”他笑称。据介绍,产生交易的第二种情况来自于换股。比如长金持仓组合里面的某只股票,股价出现了大幅上升,从而导致投资吸引力下降。这个时候,我们会将这只股票与核心股票池的其他股票进行对比。如果发现核心股票池中有股票的投资吸引力高于持仓的股票,我们会进行换股操作。